http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/sports/
Wednesday, December 24, 2008
Sure, the Steelers' running game could miraculously spring to life in the playoffs, the way the Indianapolis Colts' pathetic run defense did two years ago.
Remember?
The Colts spent 16 games establishing themselves as the NFL's worst rush defense in 45 years. They were giving up 173 yards per game and 5.3 yards per carry.
Titans' Nick Harper tracks down Steelers running back Willie Parker in the third quarter at LP Field on Sunday. The Steelers may not need a running game to win in the playoffs.
Chaz Palla/Tribune-Review
Even this year's Steelers could have run wild on that group.
But something totally unforeseen happened in the playoffs.
The Colts started stuffing people. They didn't allow 100 yards rushing in any of their three AFC playoff games. They buried Kansas City's Larry Johnson and Baltimore's Jamal Lewis.
So, yeah, the Steelers could blow our minds. They could keep the ball for 37 minutes and run for 200 yards -- especially if Willie Parker finds his burst and the right opponent winds up at Heinz Field in the divisional round.
I just wouldn't bet what's left of your 401(k) on it.
Assume the Steelers still won't be able to free Willie (or anyone else) against a good defense, and the question becomes: Can this team win the Super Bowl without a prolific running game?
The answer, unequivocally, is yes.
The New England Patriots, in their three championship seasons, had two 100-yard rushers in nine playoff games.
Last year's New York Giants averaged 103.8 yards rushing and 3.5 yards per carry in four playoff games, failing twice to reach 100 yards.
The Steelers are averaging 100.8 yards rushing and 3.6 yards per carry.
So, let's not push the myth that a big-time running game is a prerequisite to winning it all. Even the Steelers of 2005 were a pass-first, run-later team in the playoffs.
Do you need to be able to gain a yard when you need one? Absolutely. The Steelers must rectify that problem.
But the top priority is to put the superb defense in position to win the game, or least keep it close until the fourth quarter, when Ben Roethlisberger normally does his best work.
And that means protecting the football as if it were a block of gold.
Last season's Giants turned it over twice all postseason. They relied on a stout defense, solid special teams and a quarterback who made sound decisions and clutch throws.
Roethlisberger needs to remember what he said after the most impressive victory of the Bill Cowher era -- the 21-18 playoff victory three years ago at Indianapolis.
"I got some good advice the other day from (TV analyst) Dan Dierdorf," Roethlisberger said. "He said, 'Every drive that ends in a kick is a good drive.' "
Amen, and peace be to Dan Dierdorf.
If a possession ends with a punt, fine.
If it ends with a field goal, great.
Field goals get a bad name.
The Colts, during the aforementioned 2006 playoffs, won in Baltimore without scoring a touchdown. The Steelers recently had a five-game winning streak in which 11 points would have been enough to win four of the five games.
Not that Roethlisberger has to be silly safe -- just smart.
If the Steelers meet Tennessee again, for example, the Titans clearly are vulnerable to the pass. The Jets and Texans shredded them, and Roethlisberger threw for 303 yards.
Pass, then.
Just don't pass it to the other team and cover the ball in critical areas of the field (like the goal line).
Roethlisberger is more than capable of playing this type of football. He attempted 177 passes during the five-game winning streak -- at least 30 in each game -- and threw only one interception.
Big Ben remains the Steelers' best bet on a flawed offense.
I agree wholeheartedly with Baltimore's Samari Rolle, who said, after Roethlisberger drove his team 92 yards to victory, "Ben moving around is their best play."
It's not exactly The Year of the Prolific Offense in the AFC. Playoff games can and likely will be won ugly.
The Steelers, if they protect the football, have as good a chance as anyone. Maybe better, with that defense.
No comments:
Post a Comment