Monday, May 05, 2014

Penguins aiming for two in a row

First game of a rare playoff back-to-backer comes out one-sided for Pittsburgh


May 5, 2014

Kris Letang #58 of the Pittsburgh Penguins shoots and scores in front of Marc Staal #18 of the New York Rangers in Game Two of the Second Round of the 2014 Stanley Cup Playoffs at Consol Energy Center on May 4, 2014 in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. (Photo by Gregory Shamus/NHLI via Getty Images)

PITTSBURGH -- Two teams, two cities, two games, a 24-hour battle for control of this Eastern Conference semifinal series.
As the New York Rangers and Pittsburgh Penguins scurried to gather their bags and skate-sharpening gear and sticks and rolls of tape and hustle to the airport and their waiting charter aircraft, it was the Penguins who had earned top grades in the first crucial part of this two-part test.
Turning in their best performance of the postseason, in fact perhaps their single-best performance of the season, the Penguins evened this series at one game apiece with a 3-0 victory Sunday night.
Were it not for the otherworldly play of Henrik Lundqvist in the Rangers' goal stopping 32 of 34 shots and making a dozen sensational saves on Grade A scoring chances, this game would have been decided much earlier in the evening and by a much wider margin.
Now, the second and most important part of this test awaits both teams with Game 3 set for Monday night at Madison Square Garden.
There, the Penguins will have a chance to prove they have turned some kind of corner, that this wire-to-wire win in Game 2 was not an aberration. The Penguins had given signals at the end of the first round they had turned such a corner, but they stumbled badly in the first period of Game 1 against the Rangers Friday, falling behind 2-0 and ultimately losing 3-2 in overtime on Derick Brassard's winner.
Game 2 Sunday was a powerful statement, to be sure, but the real statement will be made in Game 3 Monday night in New York.
"We didn't want to go down two games to none. We didn't play our best hockey in the first game but I thought this game we came out and just skated and played well and then played a full 60-minute effort," Penguins winger Lee Stempniak said as staff quickly hustled bags out of the strangely empty Penguins locker room. "I don't know if there's so much momentum from game to game within the series, but it's definitely a quick turnaround, so it'll be a tough test in New York. It's a huge game for us. We want to go in there and get the win and make the series 2-1 and take it from there. But it'll be a challenge."
What made Sunday's win so impressive was the fact that almost every question that had been plaguing the Penguins was answered. Marc-Andre Fleury was not nearly as busy as his counterpart, but he was solid when he needed to be, such as in the first period when the overexuberant Penguins took three straight minor penalties before the midpoint. Fleury ended up stopping all 22 Rangers shots he faced.
After blowing leads repeatedly in the first round against the Columbus Blue Jackets, the Penguins made a second-period goal by Kris Letang stand up until late in the third, whenJussi Jokinen added an insurance marker on the power play with 3:30 left in regulation. Evgeni Malkin then added an empty-netter.
The Rangers managed just five shots in the third period, half as many as the Penguins, and the Penguins were steadfast in their commitment to playing strong defense. Paul Martin, for one, broke up a dangerous rush by Brad Richards with about five minutes to go in the third and, in the same sequence, Malkin backchecked diligently to thwart another Rangers rush.
As for Penguins captain Sidney Crosby, the subject of so much debate in recent days, he was the best player on the ice not named Lundqvist. He was held without a goal for the 13th straight postseason game but he was a dynamo, at one point undressing Ryan McDonagh and rifling a shot over the Rangers' goal. He led all Penguins and was tied for the game lead with six shots.
Letang said Crosby was inspiring to everyone in the Penguins' locker room.
"Good win for [Fleury]. I think he played outstanding," Letang said. "Sid was the most dangerous player out there tonight. But to put them on their heels with the momentum right now, it's huge."
[+] EnlargePittsburgh Penguins
Jamie Sabau/Getty ImagesMarc-Andre Fleury was solid while earning his seventh career playoff shutout.
Letang might illustrate the great distance this team appears to have come since the start of the playoffs. Early on against Columbus, he was benched briefly and looked out of sorts in the first few games. On Sunday, he was solid in his own zone, scored the winner and added two assists. His goal, the 15th playoff marker of his career, tied him with Hall of Famer Larry Murphy for first among Penguins defensemen in career playoff goals.
No two games are the same in a season, Letang said.
"We try to do our best every night," he said. "Sometimes there's mistakes but tonight I think we respond really well."
On the home side, the Rangers will be looking to prove Monday night they're not what they looked like for most of Sunday night's loss: worn out.
Monday's game will be their fifth in seven days and already this series is following the pattern of their seven-game, first-round victory over the Philadelphia Flyers that saw them unable to win two games in a row.
Whether fatigue was a factor in Sunday's loss or will be a factor in New York on Monday, it's hard to imagine the Rangers will be able to keep pace with the Penguins going forward if they don't solve their power-play woes. They went 0-for-4 with the man advantage and now have gone 29 straight opportunities without finding the back of the net.
Their inability to generate much on the first three chances early in the game was especially disappointing. So was the play of Rick Nash, the other star whose lack of production is a significant storyline in this series. He had three shots and a couple of decent looks but is still without a goal this spring.
"It's just good to get home," said Richards. "We came in here, got a big win in two games and now we go home and we'll use our fans and our energy and try to jump on them there. The great thing is if you get a win tomorrow right away and our goal is that, and that's two out of three and that sets you up good."
Still, Lundqvist and other Rangers noted that Game 2 featured a stark difference in the amount of time they spent in the Penguins' zone from Game 1.
"They just spent a lot of time in our own end. That was the biggest difference," Lundqvist said. "They came hard the whole night. It was something we expected."
With such a short turnaround, part of the challenge for both teams will be the mental element of the game. The Penguins will be trying to guard against a letdown, while the Rangers will be trying to keep the idea they might be tired from becoming a reality.
Rangers head coach Alain Vigneault observed that Lundqvist didn't look tired. And if he wasn't tired, then no one else in that room should feel tired either.
For better or worse we won't have to wait long to find out who earns top marks in the second part of this test of wills.

Blueshirts stars no-shows in shutout loss to Pens


May 5, 2014

Goaltender Marc-Andre Fleury #29 of the Pittsburgh Penguins makes a pad save on a shot from Rick Nash #61 of the New York Rangers in the first period in Game Two of the Second Round of the 2014 NHL Stanley Cup Playoffs on May 4, 2014 at Consol Energy Center in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. (Photo by Jamie Sabau/Getty Images)

PITTSBURGH — The deeper into the Stanley Cup playoffs you get, the more the tournament becomes a best-on-best competition.
For Sunday night’s Game 2, the Penguins’ best players were dominant pretty much start to finish while only Henrik Lundqvist made a mark for the Rangers.
It was 3-0 for Pittsburgh in a game that somehow was only 1-0 until 16:30 of the third period — well, Lundqvist was how — as the Penguins tied the Eastern Conference semis that resume at the Garden on Monday in what will be the Rangers’ fifth game in seven nights.
But fatigue was neither the enemy nor the dispositive factor in this Game 2 in which the Blueshirts never were able to assert themselves and never able to seize momentum for more than a shift at a time, if that.
Sidney Crosby — oh, boy, what a game from an explosive No. 87, who did everything except score at about a million miles an hour — was the enemy and dispositive factor. So were Evgeni Malkin, Chris Kunitz, Marc-Andre Fleury, James Neal and Kris Letang; in other words, the Penguins’ marquee athletes.
The Rangers’ top guys — well, if it is too harsh to call them no-shows for Game 2, they were other than Lundqvist — were no factors whatsoever. Rick Nash continued to go scoreless in the playoffs despite manufacturing several chances. Derek Stepan and Marty St. Louis, Nash’s linemates on what is allegedly the Blueshirts’ top unit, had absolutely miserable games as their scoreless streaks reached six games apiece.
“It’s frustrating and it’s disappointing,” Nash, who has one goal in 21 playoff games as a Ranger, told The Post. “I got chances but that isn’t good enough.
“I have to up my game and work to put pucks in the net.”
Ryan McDonagh had yet another difficult night, struggling against speed; a half-step and a decision-making process behind. The McDonagh-Dan Girardi combination was under pressure all game and in the third, Rangers’ coach Alain Vigneault more often than not switched to the Marc Staal-Anton Stralman pair to match against the dynamic Crosby-Malkin-Kunitz line.
No forward played quite well enough in either the offensive zone or the neutral zone, the Rangers unable to get the puck consistently deep, and the Penguins therefore way too often off to the races … that they were able to win throughout, just as they were able to win a huge majority of puck battles when the Blueshirts were able to create them.
“They just played a little bit harder than we did,” said Brad Richards, who had more jump at the end than he did at the start, when the power play failed on three advantages within the opening 9:04. “We were able to match them a little bit but not for the game.”
The power play that features all of the best players was a killer. Even if it seems as if the Rangers haven’t scored a power-play goal since Bobby Rousseau played the point, the drought only — ha — dates back to Game 2 of the Flyers series, a stretch that encompasses 29 straight failures. They’re 3-for-37 in the tournament.
“The power play ultimately is my responsibility,” Vigneault said. “I have to find the right trigger points to make it work. I’m going to spend the night trying to figure it out.”
If not for Lundqvist’s brilliance, the game would have devolved into a rout by the middle of the match. If the Rangers couldn’t score five-on-four, then the goaltender wouldn’t allow the Penguins to score during what often seemed stretches of one-on-five. The King has rarely been better and never so this year. He is the one and only reason Crosby remains without a goal during the postseason.
The first one to get by Lundqvist came off the stick of Girardi at 10:26 of the second as he dived frantically to break up a pass from Letang for Kunitz on a rush down the right wing. The second came on a power play rebound with 3:30 to play in regulation with Derek Dorsett in the box after committing a mindless infraction.
The schedule is grueling and perhaps unfair. No matter. That’s the schedule. As Vigneault said when asked if fatigue had been a factor, “Did my goaltender look tired?”
The better question to ask is if Nash has been tired the entire postseason and whether his linemates have been tired since Game 2 of the Flyers series?
If this is now best-on-best, the Rangers’ top players had best make their presence known, and quickly.

What was wrong with Sid? Who cares?


By Dejan Kovacevic 
http://triblive.com/sports/
Published: Sunday, May 4, 2014, 11:42 p.m.



Goaltender Henrik Lundqvist #30 of the New York Rangers makes a save on a shot from Sidney Crosby #87 of the Pittsburgh Penguins in the second period in Game Two of the Second Round of the 2014 NHL Stanley Cup Playoffs on May 4, 2014 at CONSOL Energy Center in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. (Photo by Jamie Sabau/Getty Images)

Don't ask. Just don't. I haven't got answers anymore than anyone else.
And honestly, I don't care at the moment.
I don't care why it took Sidney Crosby the better part of two weeks to suddenly, sensationally burst onto the Stanley Cup playoff scene Sunday night at Consol Energy Center. To run up a half-dozen shots. To torment New York's defensemen shift after shift. To spin and whirl and fire and even slam a couple of Rangers into the boards. To punch through the players assigned to check him rather than turn the other cheek. To do pretty much everything but register a point or that icebreaking goal.
To lead his Penguins, in every way imaginable, to that 3-0 shutout of the Rangers in Game 2 and tie their second-round series.
“Sid was awesome,” linemate Brian Gibbons was telling me afterward. “I think that's the best I've seen him play in a long time. He's had games where he's had more points, obviously. But I've never seen someone win so many battles ... the way he took their best hits and just kept going and going.”
Gibbons, seated at the stall next to the captain's, paused and added: “We just followed his lead.”
They sure did, and it didn't take much to see that. Or to hear about it.
Lee Stempniak: “He was moving really well.”
Marc-Andre Fleury: “He was flying. It was nice to see that out there.”
Kris Letang: “To see Sid play like that, I think, was really inspiring for everybody in our dressing room. He was really dangerous.”
Assistant coach Tony Granato: “You should've heard Sid on the bench. We all fed off him.”
Get the picture?
OK, so here are four things we know for certain now:
1. Crosby isn't hurt. Or if he is, it isn't debilitating. Because no human or even superhuman does all that he did Sunday while injured, no matter how much Wheaties, caffeine or cortisone gets consumed.
2. Something else was really wrong with Crosby in the first round and change — most of which saw him disoriented, even disengaged. And it positively boggles the mind whatever that might have been.
3. His teammates clearly noticed, judging by their responses to his resurrection.
4. So what?
Yeah, hard explanations are due. Maybe they'll come in time. Maybe they won't.
They didn't come Sunday as Crosby, in a great rarity, didn't meet with reporters after the game. No explanation was offered by the team and, really, given his extraordinary cooperation with the media — he might answer as many questions as every other athlete in Pittsburgh combined — none should be sought. It's a mulligan richly deserved.
And again, there will be a time for that. For now, all that matters to the Penguins is that the best player in the world looks all the way back. Nothing that came of this victory matches that in importance. Because without Crosby, or with whatever phantom simulation had been taking his place to this point, they're just another team. Moreover, they lack their very heart, their identity.
So yeah, it was wonderful to see Fleury take another stride toward playoff maturity with a 22-save shutout. It was encouraging to see Letang not only run up a goal and two assists but also rediscover some of his old swagger. And it was reassuring to see Evgeni Malkin buzzing his way back to top form, Paul Martin continuing to dominate the blue line, Matt Niskanen leading with four hits on a night when Tanner Glass was scratched and Jussi Jokinen and Chris Kunitz and James Neal reminding everyone that the Penguins are supposed to have elite wingers, too.
To say nothing of actually putting forth a consistent effort for the entirety of 60 minutes.
“A good hockey game by us,” Dan Bylsma called it. “And hard-fought. No question about that.”
Right. And all of that started with Crosby, who broke through in more ways than one.
The word, especially at playoff time, is that he doesn't like to be hit, doesn't like a glove in his face, doesn't like agitation. The word is that he'll turn away rather than fight. And by fight, I'm talking about those “battles” Gibbons described. The kind that all great players have to win this time of year because that's just the nature of the beast.
No, he didn't get that goal. And this time, I don't care about that, either. As Stempniak put it: “He had chances. It's coming. I can tell.”
That's because it's coming like a freight train. Finally.
Dejan Kovacevic is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at dkovacevic@tribweb.com or via Twitter @Dejan_Kovacevic.


Read more: http://triblive.com/sports/dejankovacevic/dejancolumns/6050780-74/crosby-really-didn#ixzz30prOQsSM 
Follow us: @triblive on Twitter | triblive on Facebook

Saturday, May 03, 2014

Defensive breakdown reminiscent of Columbus series

The Penguins’ breakdown on the game-winning goal for the Rangers might have looked a little familiar. It’s not the first time this postseason that the Penguins’ defensemen were caught behind the net and a forward tried to make an anticipatory play, only for the puck to end up in the slot and then in the back of the Penguins’ net.
Only instead of Columbus getting a big goal like it did to open Game 3 or a tying goal like it did late in Game 4, it was the Rangers who capitalized on the game-winner. The breakdown began with a flubbed push pass along the boards by Rob Scuderi. His attempted feed to Robert Bortuzzo was intercepted by Benoit Pouliot. Sidney Crosby tried to poke check the puck away from Pouliot, but the Rangers’ forward was able to slide a pass by Crosby to Derek Brassard. Lee Stempniak, apparently anticipating the push along the boards by Scuderi to Bortuzzo, left Brassard to try to pick up a potential pass. That left Brassard open for the game-winner. Even if Brassard’s shot hit the crossbar like the referees initially thought, the Penguins were scrambling so much from the initial breakdown that they never recovered in time to stop Pouliot from putting the puck back in the net a few seconds after Brassard.
Dan Bylsma tinkered once again, but ultimately he went back to more traditional lines for Game 1 against the Rangers. The Penguins coach put Evgeni Malkin and Sidney Crosby together for portions of the first period, but it didn’t last. After a couple of early penalties against the Rangers in the second period, the Penguins stayed with their normal rotation of having Malkin and Crosby on separate lines. They weren’t united again, but it didn’t seem to matter, as Malkin’s line continued to generate opportunities. Malkin, James Neal and Jussi Jokinen combined for nine of the Penguins’ 36 shots. “I thought (Malkin’s) line in particular played real well in the offensive zone,” Bylsma said. “He didn’t score the goal, James Neal did, but it’s his play and drive to the net through the defenseman that opens up the space for James for the shot.”
KEY PLAY
Rob Scuderi and Robert Bortuzzo were caught behind the goalline three minutes into overtime, enabling Benoit Pouliot to slip a pass into the slot for Derek Brassard to bury as the game-winner. The refs initially waived it off, saying it hit the crossbar, and Pouliot scored on a rebound seven seconds later. Brassard got the goal, though, and the Rangers got the win.
NOTES
An errant whistle in the first period ended a Penguins’ scoring chance and drew the ire of the crowd. At first it was ruled offsides, though the puck never went out of the New York zone. The ruling was then changed to a hand-pass, which also didn’t occur. The officials recognized the error on the ice and awarded the Penguins a faceoff in the Rangers’ zone because of the errant whistle.
Brooks Orpik and Brian Gibbons remained out of the lineup, though Gibbons appears closer to returning. Orpik hasn’t skated since leaving practice prior to Game 5 against Columbus. Gibbons has been practicing and took part in warm-ups before being scratched Friday night. Gibbons hasn’t played since Game 2.
The Penguins dropped just their fourth series opener in the last 14 Game 1s that they have played on home ice.
All three losses the Penguins have suffered this postseason have come in overtime.
Jussi Jokinen had an assist on James Neal’s second period goal, extending his postseason points streak to five games.
Sidney Crosby and Chris Kunitz were on the ice for all three Rangers goals. It’s a season low for both since a 4-0 loss to Philadelphia on March 15.
QUOTEWORTHY
I think if we come out with a quicker start out of the box, I think we’ll be in good shape…We’re not worried. We’ll be fine.” – Marc-Andre Fleury
THREE STARS
3. Stempniak
2. Girardi
1. Pouliot

Embarrassed? Not Penguins


By Dejan Kovacevic 
http://triblive.com/sports/
Published: Friday, May 2, 2014, 11:36 p.m.





Say this for these Penguins: They aren't easily embarrassed.
“I thought we were pretty solid all night.”
That was the assessment of Rob Scuderi. He was singularly responsible for the giveaway that led to New York's overtime goal by Derick Brassard, the one that lifted the allegedly exhausted, energy-depleted Rangers, 3-2, past the allegedly rested, revved-up Penguins in Game 1 of their Stanley Cup playoff series Friday night at Consol Energy Center.
“I think when you play well, you trust the next one's going to go in.”
That was the assessment of Sidney Crosby, asked about his own performance.
He went a 12th consecutive playoff game without a goal, mustered only three shots, went 6-13 in the faceoff circle and posted a minus-3 rating. He was on the ice for that overtime goal, and that should be taken literally: He was prone behind Marc-Andre Fleury when the Rangers continued to run rampant after it wasn't clear that Brassard's shot had entered the net. For good measure, Benoit Pouliot buried yet another, marking perhaps the first two-goal overtime victory in NHL history.
Yeah, the Rangers were so tired they kept scoring even after they'd won.
“It was more of a 50/50 period. We ended up on the short end of the scoreboard with the two goals they got.”
That was the most incredible assessment of all, one regarding this game's first period, and it came from Dan Bylsma. He's the head coach.
Wow.
He's the one ultimately responsible for ensuring his players are ready to play right from the drop of the puck.
He's the one who had set a common theme all through practice this week — the right theme, I'll stress — that the Penguins needed to pounce on this New York team that had just played vicious Games 6 and 7 against Philadelphia of all teams, all while the Penguins had been idle since Monday's elimination of Columbus. This was Bylsma's idea, one repeated by his players. The Rangers needed to be hit, needed to be worn down, needed to have nothing left in the tank by game's end, never mind the quick Games 2 and 3 on the horizon Sunday and Monday.
And he's the one who looked back at that first period, the one in which the Rangers not only had taken a 2-0 lead but also a 13-8 edge in shots and a decided edge in physical play, and he saw that first period as a 50/50 endeavor. Moreover, he wouldn't correctly identify that first period for being almost wholly responsible for all that followed, including the finish.
Wow squared.
Is there anyone on this team, in this organization, who can call it like it is?
Really, what's the harm?
If anything, it isn't until the Penguins feel some sense of purpose or anger or anything that they begin playing with any kind of passion. Maybe they could use it.
Look, this isn't to pick on those quoted above. Other views were no different, really. Rather, it's to point out that, for as long as the problems remain with focus and effort — and yes, being physical at least once in a while — this team can't be taken seriously as a Cup contender, no matter how much fortune has befallen them with the rest of the Eastern field.
Man alive, they've got to want it, you know?
Do they?
I've got no idea right now. I don't know how anyone could, because it seems like every step forward is met with a confounding step back, as if the other never occurred.
The list, if nothing else, is consistent: Crosby has to be better, even if he's playing through some kind of injury. He's out there getting star minutes. He has to be a star. Evgeni Malkin has to shoot more. You know, like Game 6 in Columbus. Marc-Andre Fleury can't give up unscreened 40-foot wristers like Pouliot's in the first period. The team as a whole has to play much tighter, with a much greater concentration on forwards backchecking through the neutral zone. One of the few times the Penguins did that on this night, it resulted in James Neal retrieving the puck and scoring.
Above all, though, they still need — even after this blown opportunity — to wear down New York's terrific group of defensemen. Because, make no mistake, the Rangers are built from Henrik Lundqvist out to the shutdown pair of Ryan McDonagh and Dan Girardi out to the rest of a sound corps.
Every last one of them, including Lundqvist despite spending so much time inside his own net he'll be sent a bill for rent, escaped this one unscathed.
“They came out hard, and we knew they would.”
That was the assessment of Girardi when I asked what he thought of the Penguins' first period.
Kept a straight face, too.
Dejan Kovacevic is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at dkovacevic@tribweb.com or via Twitter @Dejan_Kovacevic.


Read more: http://triblive.com/sports/dejankovacevic/dejancolumns/6044792-74/penguins-period-rangers#ixzz30dvFERFS 
Follow us: @triblive on Twitter | triblive on Facebook

Friday, May 02, 2014

Second-round preview: Penguins - Rangers


May 1, 2014

Sidney Crosby and Henrik Lundqvist
The last time these two teams met in the playoffs, in the second round in 2008, the Penguins were an emerging force and the Rangers were trying to meld the old of Jaromir Jagr and Brendan Shanahan with the new of Henrik LundqvistDan Girardi and Marc Staal. The Penguins dispatched the Rangers in five games en route to a berth in the Stanley Cup finals. This time around, the Penguins are trying to restore their championship luster after a number of disappointing turns following their Cup win in 2009. The Rangers, meanwhile, continue to search for the right combination that will get them over the playoff hump, having failed to return to the Cup finals since their last Cup win, in 1994. The Penguins endured some up-and-down moments against a plucky Columbus Blue Jackets team before playing their best hockey in the final two victories. The Rangers, meanwhile, eked out a 2-1 victory in Game 7 against the Philadelphia Flyers and will end up playing three games in four nights, with Game 1 of the conference semifinals series set tentatively to start Friday.

Spotlight On

Penguins: Sidney Crosby
With Chris Kunitz and Evgeni Malkin showing signs of life late in the series against Columbus (Malkin potted three in the sixth and deciding game for his first playoff goals since the end of the second round last spring), James Neal looking dangerous and even Kris Letang scoring an empty-net goal, it falls to captain Sidney Crosby to bear the brunt of the ongoing "Gee, are you ever going to score another playoff goal?" line of questioning. And, to be fair, the fact it's been 11 straight postseason games without a goal for the player who will assuredly run away with the Hart Trophy as the league's regular-season MVP is more than a little vexing. But here's the thing, Crosby has been very good thus far. He's won key draws, he's backchecked like a demon and he's moved the puck around on a power play that scored six times in the first round (although the unit did give up three short-handed goals). Now, it does seem inconceivable the Penguins can advance to the Eastern Conference finals for the second season in a row without Crosby pitching in with actual goals, but the first round showed that it's not imperative.
Rangers: Rick Nash
Well, if the pressure is on Crosby to find the back of the net, there is at least an equal amount of pressure on two-time Olympic gold medalist Rick Nash, who continues to struggle to produce for the Rangers at the times when they acquired him most to produce -- in the playoffs. Nash didn't score in the seven-game set with the Flyers and now has one goal in 19 postseason games since he was acquired at great cost from the Blue Jackets in the summer of 2012. Throw in his one goal in four games with the Blue Jackets in '09, and Nash has managed to score just twice in 22 postseason games, and he has never played beyond the second round since coming into the league in 2002-03. As with Crosby, Nash does other things, although, given that he doesn't play center, those mitigating plays are fewer. Like Crosby with the Pens, Nash's lack of goal scoring (he had four assists) didn't keep the Rangers from advancing to the second round. But we're guessing it's more imperative Nash start scoring than Crosby.

Hero In Waiting

Penguins: Kris Letang
Things didn't start out all that well in the first round for last season's Norris Trophy nominee Letang. And, no doubt, it's been a tough season for the smooth-skating Letang, whose career was suddenly thrown into doubt when he suffered a stroke. But after a couple of shaky games to start that resulted in a brief benching, Letang returned to form as the series moved along. He was especially effective when paired with Paul Martin after Brooks Orpik left with an injury. He'll still have to control his temper, and while, he has at least temporarily lost his spot on the top power-play unit, Letang has the tools to become an important figure in a series that figures to turn on the Pens' ability to force the Rangers to open up.
Rangers: Zuccarello's line
How good is the Rangers' forward unit of Derick BrassardMats Zuccarello and Benoit Pouliot? Well, pretty darned good. Even though Brad Richards and Martin St. Louis led the Rangers in the first round with six points apiece, this unit of Brassard, Zuccarello and Pouliot might well have been the team's most consistent group from start to finish and, in fact, produced the game's winning goal in Game 7. Pouliot has been especially impressive and might be playing the best hockey of his career. Pretty good for a guy who was long been considered a bust after having been selected with the fourth-overall pick in 2005 by the Minnesota Wild. That kind of continued production will be important because the Rangers will be in tough to keep up offensively with the Penguins.

Fatal Flaw

Penguins: Sloppy defense
If you polled 100 people, Penguins fans or not, and asked them what the team's fatal flaw is, we're guessing 90 or so would point to netminder Marc-Andre Fleury. We don't think so. First of all, Fleury was the team's most consistent player in the six-game series with the Blue Jackets. Yeah, he melted down a bit in Game 4 but was pretty darned good otherwise. Of greater concern is the Penguins' propensity to lose their marbles defensively. Defensive-zone turnovers and turnovers in the neutral zone, sometimes precipitated by careless, cutesy passes, the kind that very talented teams make because they think they can do stuff like that with impunity, are something the Pens can't afford against a Rangers team that has the speed and skill to take advantage of those kinds of mistakes.
Rangers: Inconsistency
Can the Rangers find enough consistency in their game to stay with a Penguins team that can be a serious handful? The series with the Flyers was a study in contrasts for the Rangers: one night, tight defensively and opportunistic offensively, on their heels and disorganized the next. The fact the Rangers were able to rebound from a horrific performance in Game 6 in Philadelphia to get a win in Game 7 was impressive, but they went 0-for-13 on the power play on the road against Philadelphia and were just 3-for-29 overall. They'll have to be better more often to keep pace with the Penguins.

Prediction

Not sure the perceived advantage in goal the Rangers have with Lundqvist is as pronounced as it might seem on first blush. With Brandon Sutter looking like he's recovered from missing time in Game 6 after an injury off a blocked shot, the Pens have lots of options down the middle and, in the end, will prove too much for the Rangers.
Penguins in 6

Thursday, May 01, 2014

Steelers' 1974 draft class recalled by lesser-known talents


By Alan Robinson 
http://triblive.com/sports/
Published: Wednesday, April 30, 2014, 10:15 p.m.




Lynn Swann and John Stallworth

Jack Lambert didn't need much training camp time to realize the transition from Kent State to the NFL wouldn't be as difficult as he expected.
“Jack is sitting there in the locker room with his teeth out, a cigarette in his hand, saying, ‘When I first came here, my goal was to make the team. But now I know I'm going to start,'” former Steelers draft pick Bruce Henley said.
Lambert's confidence was mirrored by Lynn Swann, John Stallworth, Mike Webster and even free agent Donnie Shell, rookies whose impact was seen, felt and heard from the day they stepped foot on St. Vincent College's campus in July 1974.
This is the 40th anniversary of the Steelers' Class of 1974, a 21-member draft class that is the best in NFL history. Of the five Hall of Famers drafted by NFL teams that year, four were Steelers, an unprecedented talent haul that immediately propelled the franchise to four Super Bowl wins in six seasons.
“You're not thinking about those things, banging around in camp, but I knew they were good. Lynn was good, because I'd seen him play,” former Purdue linebacker Mart Gefert said. “Jack, with his demeanor and work ethic, you knew he had ‘it' — you just knew it.”
NFL veterans were on strike, so the rookies and 30 to 40 free agents had the run of camp until the labor dispute ended Aug. 10. Both Gefert and Henley said that time allowed the rookies to make an impression on coach Chuck Noll and his staff — and the other rookies.
Shell was a little-known safety from South Carolina State who somehow slid through the 17-round draft without being selected, but it quickly became evident he could play. He later made the Pro Bowl five times.
“He was full speed ahead, confident and loved to hit. He was always around the ball, and you could hear his hits ... from one end of the camp to the other,” Henley said. “The way he hit sounded different from the other players. Some of the wide receivers were intimidated.”
While that Steelers' class is largely ignored except for the Hall of Famers, two other picks had long NFL careers.
Defensive back Jimmy Allen made 31 interceptions in eight seasons, including nine in his final season with the Lions. Linebacker Charles Davis played seven seasons, all but one with the St. Louis Cardinals, and once had a five-sack playoff game against the Rams.
Gefert believes money, or the lack of it — the average salary was $56,500, and rookies made much less — contributed to the class' success.
“We were sitting around a dorm room comparing contracts, and some guys knew what guys from other teams were making,” Gefert said. “Some picks got this and that, but the Pittsburgh contracts were incentive-laden. I think we worked harder because there were incentives.”
Henley was disappointed when he was cut late in camp because, he said, ‘I came to think, ‘Man, I do have a good chance.' But when you came down to it, there were just too many good ones.”
More than any other NFL team ever had in a single draft class. The class to which all others are compared.
Alan Robinson is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at arobinson@tribweb.com or via Twitter @arobinson_Trib.
Mike Webster
The PICKS
1: Lynn Swann, WR, Southern California. Hall of Famer and one of the best big-game receivers in NFL history; made a TD catch in five of Steelers' six playoff games in 1978-79. Now co-owner of Arena Football's Pittsburgh Power.
2: Jack Lambert, LB, Kent State. Hall of Famer who became a starter and one of defense's leaders as a rookie. Nine-time Pro Bowler and six-time All-Pro pick. Still lives in W.Pa.; longtime youth league coach.
3: No pick.
4a: John Stallworth, WR, Alabama A&M. Held Steelers records for catches and yardage until Hines Ward broke them. Hall of Famer. Now a Steelers ownership group member. Founded an information technology services company that once employed more than 600.
4b: Jimmy Allen, DB, UCLA. Known as Spiderman, made 31 INTs in nine NFL seasons, all but seven INTs with Lions (1978-1981). Played for Steelers from 1974-77. Founded a Laundromat business after retiring but it wasn't successful, and he lived homeless for a time in Los Angeles.
5: Mike Webster, C, Wisconsin. Hall of Famer who played from 1974-90, with all but two seasons with Steelers. Was a Chiefs assistant coach but, troubled by brain damage after years of intense hitting during an era when concussions were not considered serious, died in 2002 at age 50. He was the first former NFL player diagnosed with CTE, or chronic traumatic encephalopathy.
6a: Jim Wolf, DE, Prairie View A&M. Played two seasons. Died in 2003 of multiple sclerosis.
6b: Rick Druschel, OL, N.C. State. Won a Super Bowl ring with Steelers in 1974; later became a longtime high school coach, athletic director and principal in suburban Pittsburgh.
7a: Allen Sitterle, OL, N.C. State. Never played with Steelers, but was a 30-year high school football coach, mostly in South Carolina, with a career record of 282-98 and four state titles.
7b: Scott Garske, TE, Eastern Washington. Chosen for college's athletic Hall of Fame in 2012, son played QB for school's 1997 Division II semifinalist team.
8: Mark Gefert, LB, Purdue. Cut by Steelers, he made all-CFL team for Winnipeg but was cut again by Giants after making a second attempt to play in NFL. Now the athletic academic adviser at Cleveland State.
9a: Tommy Reamon, RB, Missouri. Turned down Steelers to play in World Football League, was tri-MVP of league in 1974. Later played in CFL with Saskatchewan.
9b: Charles Davis, DL, TCU. Played 7 seasons in NFL, one with Steelers; once had a five-sack playoff game for St. Louis. Later became an actor (“North Dallas Forty,” “Charlie's Angels”) and a longtime educator in Newport News, Va.
10a: Jim Kregel, OL, Ohio State. Didn't play for Steelers, but still regarded as one of Buckeyes' best linemen ever; played briefly in WFL.
10b: Dave Atkinson, DB, Brigham Young. Played briefly in WFL; later had two sons, Josh and Jordan, receive football scholarships to alma mater.
11: Dickey Morton, RB, Arkansas. Played for Toronto (CFL). Chosen for Arkansas Hall of Honor in 2012 despite being charged in 2007 with 21 felony counts involving fraud.
12: Hugh Lickiss, LB, Simpson College. Recently chosen for college's hall of fame; son wanted to be a college player, too, but instead became a professional singer after a career-ending injury.
13: Frank Kolch, QB, Eastern Michigan. Drafted after being recommended by assistant coach Woody Widenhofer, he never signed a contract and quit camp early on after telling Chuck Noll he didn't want to play any longer.
14: Bruce Henley, DB, Rice. Was cut late in camp by Steelers, then went to Jacksonville Sharks (WFL) but team folded. Now a vice president of Brock Group, a 17,000-empolyee provider of services to heavy industry clients.
15: Larry Hunt, DT, Iowa State. Didn't play in NFL, but still is regarded as one of the best linemen in Cyclones' history.
16: Octavius Morgan, LB, Illinois. Played briefly for Calgary (CFL).
17: Larry Moore, DE, Angelo State. Didn't play in NFL, still active in school's alumni functions.


Jack Lambert


Read more: http://triblive.com/sports/steelers/6028732-74/steelers-nfl-played#ixzz30So9nhG8 
Follow us: @triblive on Twitter | triblive on Facebook